Home
About this Journal
Links:
My Webpage Brett's Weird Theses Illuminating Science Piled Higher and Deeper Michael Nielsen's blog My Last.FM page
Current Month
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930
Oct. 22nd, 2008 @ 08:31 am A question for all artists/anthropologists
Tags: ,
If I asked a random person in the street to draw a person they'd draw a stick figure. If I asked them to draw the sun, they'd draw a circle with maybe "shine lines" coming out of it. These are a bunch of standard ideograms. My question is: Because these ideograms are based on a visual representation of the object, do all cultures (throughout all time) use the same kind of drawings for the same concept? Or more simply, does everyone use stick figures to draw humans real easy?
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Oct. 26th, 2007 @ 12:16 am Simulated Architecture #2: The Concept of Distance
Current Music: Rihanna - Umbrella
A core concept to architecture, town planning and 3d graphics is that of "distance" and what I want to talk about in this installment. )
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Oct. 23rd, 2007 @ 11:50 pm Simulated Architecture #1: Welcome to The City
Current Mood: curious
The catalyst for this project is the question: "Can computers create art?" My gut feeling is that as impressive as computers are, they cannot create "true art", the kind of art that arrests your very thoughts. They can compute, they can infer, but they cannot make that extra leap. The driving question then is: How far can they go?  )
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Jun. 5th, 2007 @ 11:49 pm Games of computers
Current Mood: okay
Tags:
I've played a fair few games lately. This post is a longish spiel on them.

Infernal )

Hacker Evolution )

Evil Genius )

I've also been playing a bit of Spider Solitaire. Such a mindless but addictive game. *sigh*
About this Entry
Ed Norton
May. 1st, 2007 @ 09:52 pm I hate stative verbs
Current Mood: creative
So long story short, a friend and I are going to have a Mills and Boon battle. She reckons she can write trashy Mills and Boon better than I can. I defied such an assertion and so the battle's on.

I don't have time (or brain cells I don't need) to read any Mills and Boon, but I've done research. Apparently a strong characteristic of Mills and Boon is that female characters are described with stative verbs and men with dynamic verbs (i.e. "She loved the sailor, despite his outwardly appearance" versus "He felt love for the maiden, despite her outwardly appearance.") If folk gender psychology is to be believed, books written by a female should be written predominantly with stative verbs, and ones by men with dynamic verbs. I thought it might be a good idea to analyse Breathe to see where it falls, seeing as it is told from a female POV.

Unsurprisingly, it's dynamic. This is because I love indicating mood through body language. To replace it with the stative equivalent would be telegraphing the novel far too much. For example:

Maggie unwrapped a small yellow lollipop and stuck it in her mouth. She shrugged. She held her hand up, grasping an imaginary globe and said theatrically, "I shall see where the rivers of time do take this ravishing young lass."

versus

Maggie had a small yellow lollipop in her mouth. She didn't have an answer. She imagined herself as a theatrical clairvoyant: "I shall see where the rivers of time do take this ravishing young lass."

I don't think the second example is anywhere near as evocative as the first. Chuck Palahniuk wrote essays on this sort of thing; he said a writer should "unpack" and experience because plain (typically stative) verbs are too ordinary. Anyone can dislike a movie. But you can see the differences in character between someone who might boo a movie, give it the thumbs-down, or roll their eyes at it. There's a limit to this as you can't "unpack" an experience fully without losing something or being overly verbacious. Corresponding, my writing style is predominantly dynamic and I only use stative verbs in speech or where it's more efficient to just state the character's feelings (In the middle of a monologue about a bigger point: "I love him" versus "He made my heart thump faster and caused my mind to wander".)

I'm gonna take on the Mills and Boon battle and use it to gain greater control over my writing. If I can write in a style that I hate, then I won't be as lazy in my normal writing style.

Guys, girls, where do you fall on stative verbs versus dynamic verbs? Do you know? In the two examples above, which feels more natural to you?
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Apr. 9th, 2007 @ 10:47 pm It's evolution, baby!
Current Mood: curious
Tags: ,
You know what I'd like to hear? A massive compilation of music chronicling the musical trends throughout the 20th century, linked by explanations of how one trend influenced the next. I believe that something like this (correctly done) would be culturally important. And cool.

I like it how Punk is reaction against hippie rock, in an attempt to recapture Rock and Roll for the then-current political and economical climate. And then New Wave grew out of that, experimenting more with instrumentation and shedding some of the political ideology. New Wave meets back again with heavy metal to produce Grunge. Grunge flourishes but then is snowed under by Rap. Rap becomes commercialised and is eventually supplanted by the mainstream version of Emo, harkening back to Punk.

If you were interested how I got here tonight, I was looking up the word that meant "punishing yourself for cathartic release" for notes on Breathe. I couldn't think of the word and so tried "flagellation" (hoping there'd be some association). Nope. "Asceticism". Nope. By this time my motivation was waning, and I clicked on "Straight edge". From there I got to "Hardline" and from there to punk (via Hardcore punk). And then I read the very entertaining article on Punk rock and its relations to all sorts of music. (I also found out that some bastards had stolen an idea I had about 8 years ago)
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Mar. 15th, 2007 @ 07:09 am Google Think
Current Mood: late for work
So I've been thinking about Google: what it does, how it does it, and limitations of their approach. One question that is quite intriguing to me is the following scenario:

Suppose a user gives Google some information (eg search terms, a file). If Google was allowed to take some time (a minute, an hour, a day even), what sort of services could it offer that it can't offer now?

This "long-time" effect will be a constraint on our thinking. Google could just do a really slow and stupid search, but that doesn't count. You have to come up with an idea that genuinely takes time.

Thinking about how they currently do things can give some indication to how tricky this is. One of the ways they make things lightning-fast is to do precalculations. After the Googlebot has trawled the web, sucking up documents and following links, an inverted index is made, specifying which documents contain which interesting words. It takes about two months from go to woah for Google to index the web from scratch. It then does precalculations to rank documents based on how useful they might be (this is done via PageRank). Of course it doesn't take two months to search the web for you: it does all the calculations in the background and what you're searching is the processed data. This is still a monumental task, but they get speed by distributing computing and caching certain queries. And the data they hold isn't necessarily two months old; they check frequently-updated sites regularly and update their data incrementally.

So to get a "long" task, we have to have something that can't be precomputed. I can't say, "Hey Google, I want to go on a holiday to the Bahamas, what's the best deal?" because they can do this processing for every city in the whole world and have a regularly updated "This is what Google recommends for the Bahamas" set of data. Even if you throw in certain constraints, that just narrows down the search range and doesn't require any special processing to deal with this.

I can't ask for trends because it can correlate those from the news and web trawls based on time. (And they already do it, lightning-fast)

I can't give Google a document and say, "Hey Google, what documents are like this one?" because that just requires characterizing your file and then it'd run a search for key terms or something like that. For more subtle, accurate results, maybe this could be done, but all the time has to fall on characterizing your file because we already know what every other document in the world is like (aka web-trawling).

Directions to places are already done quickly and fairly accurately. Real-time services like Google Ride Finder are useless to give after a minute's computation.

The only thing I could think of so far was that you give Google a bunch of source code and it compiles it for you using parallel-compilation. This is essentially a renderfarm approach (you could equivalently give it some 3d animation files and ask Google to render it for you).

Any ideas?
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Jan. 31st, 2007 @ 06:45 am Inevitability
Tags: ,
A question came to me from where ideas usually come from (nowhere). Suppose you visit your doctor about some ailment and after much testing, the doctor says that you have a rare, complicated affliction such that it is almost certain you will die in two month's time. Surgery and so forth would be horrible but not offer a substantial chance of living. It won't be degenerative; you'll just die at some point in two months time. The question is: Would you tell anyone?




On a related note, The Dividing Line is no more, for the time being. It boiled down being too much effort for too little return (as far as traffic went). We're thinking about it, but it's on the backburner. It will end up costing us for web space and domains and we have to decide if we want that expense.
About this Entry
Ed Norton
Jul. 3rd, 2005 @ 03:03 am Something to muse on
Current Mood: musey
In an ideal world, should the news only report that which is historical? (that is, is most likely of wide historical importance)

Challenge question: Should blogs?
About this Entry
Ed Norton